MediaValet vs Aprimo

Which DAM delivers more?

As marketing and creative teams look to streamline operations, many Aprimo users report frustration with the platform’s complexity, slower onboarding, and limited brand governance tools. While Aprimo offers a broad suite of marketing operations capabilities, its DAM functionality often falls short when it comes to brand portals, ease of use, speed, and customer support. 

MediaValet stands out as the modern choice for teams that need faster go-live times, intuitive usability, and industry-leading support—while ensuring stronger brand governance and portals. 

Let’s dive into how MediaValet compares to Aprimo.

Aprimo VS MediaValet Hero

Why do customers choose MediaValet over Aprimo? 

MediaValet delivers better ROI, better brand guidelines, better support, and a better templating solution.
See for yourself: 

Experience Portals Feature 4

Stronger Brand Portals and Guidelines  

MediaValet makes it simple to manage, share, and enforce brand standards, while Aprimo customers often report challenges with brand governance and limited capabilities. 

  • Brand Guidelines satisfaction: MediaValet 89% vs. Aprimo’s 84%
  • Brand Portal satisfaction: MediaValet 90% vs. Aprimo’s 83%
  • Easily distribute on-brand content across internal teams and external partners

A Templating Solution that Works 

While Aprimo customers often cite frustration with its templating tools, like limited flexibility and user satisfaction, MediaValet offers a fully embedded solution powered by Marq. This built-in integration allows marketing and creative teams to deliver on-brand, adaptable content at scale without burdening designers.

  • 75% of DAM and templating users save money
  • 67% of DAM and templating users launch campaigns faster
  • 100% stronger brand consistency reported by DAM and templating users
Templating Feature
Quality Support Feature 3

White Glove Support and Onboarding

Customers consistently rate MediaValet higher in quality of support and long-term partnership than Aprimo, which struggles with slower response times and support tied to its broader suite of products. 

  • MediaValet scores 94% support satisfaction vs. Aprimo’s 89%   
  • Dedicated onboarding and training tailored to marketing and creative teams
  • White-glove customer success ensures higher adoption and faster time-to-value 

Faster Go-Live Time and ROI

While Aprimo implementations can drag on for months, MediaValet gets teams up and running quickly, reducing disruption and accelerating ROI. 

  • MediaValet customers go-live in 3 months vs. Aprimo’s 6 months 
  • Smooth migration paths for assets of all types and volumes
  • Rapid time-to-value means campaigns and projects launch sooner 
DAM ROI Feature 1
Product Image Feature 4

Easier to Use, Administor, and Set Up

Aprimo users often highlight challenges with platform updates, steep learning curves, and heavy admin involvement. MediaValet’s simplicity and intuitive design make adoption seamless across teams. 

And the results? 

  • Ease of Admin: MediaValet scores 88% vs. Aprimo’s 80%  
  • Ease of Setup: MediaValet scores 85% vs. Aprimo’s 77%
  • Ease of Use: MediaValet scores 88% vs. Aprimo’s 86%

The 2025 G2 DAM Vendor Report

See how MediaValet compares with other digital asset management platforms like Brandfolder, Bynder, and Canto. 

2025 g2 page mockup

Feature Comparison

MediaValet Leads where it Matters Most 

For organizations frustrated with or looking for more than Aprimo’s complexity and slower time to value, MediaValet provides a smarter path forward. With faster go-live times, higher support scores, and superior brand governance tools, MediaValet gives organizations the intuitive, scalable DAM they need to centralize, govern, and deliver content with ease.

MV VS Aprimo

Hear from Our Customers 

Michel Hales

From day one, Media Valet has been a dream. . . the team at MediaValet helped COMMANDO figure out the best way to set up and use the DAM for our company.

Michel Hales

Director of Operations Commando Advertising

Rasheda Abdullah Hairston

We get nothing but amazing feedback from users about how much they love it (MediaValet) and use it everyday!

Rasheda Abdullah Hairston

Marketing Communication Coordinator Emory University

Verified G2 User

The onboarding manager and customer success manager I’ve worked with have been fantastic, making the migration process super easy.

Verified G2 User

Frequently asked questions

How does Aprimo compare to MediaValet in ease of use?


Aprimo users often report that the platform can feel overly complex, requiring more admin involvement and training to manage effectively.

MediaValet, by contrast, is designed for simplicity—scoring higher in ease of setup (85% vs. Aprimo’s 77%), ease of use (88% vs. 86%), and ease of admin (88% vs. 80%) on G2.   

How does MediaValet’s security compare to Aprimo’s?


In short; MediaValet’s enterprise-grade security goes beyond Acquia’s proprietary setup.  

MediaValet is built on Microsoft Azure—the most secure, scalable, and globally trusted cloud infrastructure available. 

– SOC 2 Type II compliance, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and FERPA readiness 
– Full encryption at rest and in transit using AES-256 and TLS 1.2+ 
– Enterprise Single Sign-On (SSO), SCIM provisioning, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and granular permissions across users and roles 
-Audit logs, custom retention policies, and full compliance toolkits for regulated industries like government, healthcare, and finance 

For organizations where data integrity, access control, and compliance aren’t just nice-to-haves — they’re non-negotiable — MediaValet provides peace of mind at scale. 

Which platform provides better customer support?


MediaValet consistently leads in support with a 94% satisfaction score, compared to Aprimo’s 89%.

Customers highlight MediaValet’s white-glove onboarding, responsive service, and dedicated customer success managers as key advantages.

How do Aprimo and MediaValet compare when it comes to brand portals?


Aprimo’s brand governance features lag behind, with customers citing limitations around portals and enforcing brand guidelines.

MediaValet excels here, scoring 90% in Brand Portals and 89% in Brand Guidelines, making it easier to distribute on-brand content internally and externally..

What’s the average go-live time for MediaValet vs Aprimo?


MediaValet customers typically achieve go-live in about 3 months, while Aprimo averages 6 months. This means organizations can start realizing value faster with MediaValet, reducing downtime and accelerating ROI.

Ready to explore a better Aprimo alternative? 

Choosing MediaValet is about more than storing assets; it’s about giving your teams the tools they need to move faster, stay consistent, and eliminate creative bottlenecks. If Aprimo’s complexity, slower go-live times, or limited templating capabilities are holding you back, MediaValet is ready to help.
Book a demo today and see how we can help you:

  • Launch campaigns faster with built-in templating and content kits 
  • Strengthen brand consistency across teams and channels 
  • Eliminate complexity with an intuitive user interface